How Many Apostles?
How many apostles are explicitly mentioned in the pages of the New Testament?
A common misconception pervades many minds these days: “There were 12 apostles—the twelve who followed Jesus. Judas dropped out and was replaced by Paul.” However, as strange as it may seem to some, there are as many as 25 apostles explicitly mentioned in the pages of the New Testament.
How Many Apostles?
Let’s start counting. Yes, there were the twelve chosen by Jesus. Eleven are named in Acts 1:13, “Peter and John, and James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot, and Judas the son of James. “ Judas Iscariot, one of the original twelve, the one who betrayed Jesus, is not named in that list. That’s the original twelve. Then add Matthias who replaced Judas Iscariot to become one of the twelve apostles of the Lamb (Acts 1:26). “And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb” (Revelation 21:14). When we include both Judas and Matthias the total is now thirteen.
We know additional apostles besides these men exist because Christ, after His ascension, appointed “some as apostles, some as prophets, some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers . . . until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ” (Ephesians 4:11-13). Are we there yet? Have we all attained to the unity of the faith? Or mature manhood? Or the fullness of Christ? Clearly, the apostolic ministry will continue until Christ returns!
An investigation of the Scripture reveals several individuals in addition to the original twelve who are explicitly referred to as apostles. We might call them “apostles of the throne“, “apostles of the Lamb” or “ascension-gift apostles.” A complete listing of New Testament apostles follows.
James, the half brother of Jesus and leader of the Jerusalem church—Galatians 1:19
Barnabas–Acts 14:14
Paul–Acts 14:14 and many other references
Apollos– Corinthians 4:6-9
Timothy and Silvanus– I Thessalonians 1:1 and 2:6
Epaphroditus–Philippians 2:25. While the King James Version translates the word as “messenger”, the Greek word (apostolon) is actually “apostle”.
Two unnamed apostles–Second Corinthians 8:23. A brother of fame among the churches, and a brother tested–“As for our brethren, they are messengers of the churches, a glory to Christ.” Again, the Greek word is “apostoloi” but is translated here as “messengers”.
These nine now make a total of 22 (13 + 9 = 22).
Andronicus and Junia–Romans 16:7 “Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellow prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.” Were these genuine apostles or were they, as some (Charles Ryrie and others) translate, “well-known to the apostles”? If we count Andronicus and Junia, the total jumps to 24.
How Many Apostles?
Finally, Hebrews 3:1 designates Jesus Christ the “Apostle and High Priest of our profession.” That makes 25 apostles in the New Testament!
For more intriguing insights about apostles, come to Churches and Apostles. This info could make a whale of a difference in the Kingdom of God today.
In my King James Version Bible says in second Corinthians 8:23 that Titus is the apostle, and his name is not unknown, and apostle Paul is the writer on second Corinthians. So I’m assuming your going by a different translation that’s not the KJV, all the more why I will go by the KJV no matter what cause seems to me every other translations have words added or taken away from the Word of God, and if you are going by the KJV then forgive me but you might want to re-look over a few things
Dear Brother Kraig,
Thanks you so much for your words. You have caused me to search deeper and for a moment I wondered if I had missed something. Let’s check it out again. Paul is mentioning 3 fellows–Titus (his partner and fellow worker) and 2 other brothers. Both of the other brethren are messengers (Gr: apostoloi) of the churches. This passage does not say yea or nay about Titus being an apostle.
Both the KJV and the NASB agree on this.
23 Whether any do enquire of Titus, he is my partner and fellowhelper concerning you: or our brethren be enquired of, they are the messengers of the churches, and the glory of Christ. KJV
23 As for Titus, he is my partner and fellow worker among you; as for our brethren, they are messengers of the churches, a glory to Christ. NASB
Please write again. Your comments will be helpful.
Thank you, Mark
Just came across this>
while I appreciate the distinction made with Titus, “…..Titus, he is my partner and fellowhelper concerning you: ….” as NOT being an apostle ; base on this logic, then Andronicus and Junias are also NOT apostles. That makes the count 23 rather than 25 and since Jesus is above all and in whom we all exist and have our being, no need to put Jesus as an apostle with the others; it makes the count 22 instead.
Can you elaborate further.
Hey wit,
Thanks for your comments.
I simply included the people expressly termed apostles in the pages of the NT. At least we both see there were more than 12 apostles!
If ‘Paul, Barnabus & Silas (Silvanus)’ made the list of apostles; can we also include ‘Judas surnamed Barsabus’ to the list according to Acts 15:22? Keep up the great work! 🙂
Judas called Barsabbas is one of the leading men among the brethren according to Acts 15:22, but he is nowhere called an apostle. In fact, in Acts 15:32 this same Judas is referred to as a prophet. Thanks for our thoughts.
If we study scripture carefully we can see plainly Matthias is the replacement for Judas not Paul as so many erroneously believe. Oftentimes we make errors simply by not allowing the scriptures to be The Authority!!!
I just heard that Andronicus and Junia were Apostles. In the kjv as well as the niv it’s questionable, how is it written in Greek? Is it clear that they were Apostles? Also if it is, then there was a female Apostle , how then can we continue to hold the belief that women shouldn’t teach?
Hi Rachel,
Andonicus and Junia (or Junias) are not called Apostles in context.
Here are a few translations of Romans 16:7.
Romans 16:7 (AV): Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.
Romans 16:7 (NASB95): Greet Andronicus and Junias, my kinsmen and my fellow prisoners, who are outstanding among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.
Romans 16:7 (ESV): Greet Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen and my fellow prisoners. They are well known to the apostles, and they were in Christ before me.
Romans 16:7 (HCSB): Greet Andronicus and Junia, my fellow countrymen and fellow prisoners. They are noteworthy in the eyes of the apostles, and they were also in Christ before me.
Romans 16:7 (NA26): ἀσπάσασθε Ἀνδρόνικον καὶ Ἰουνιᾶν τοὺς συγγενεῖς μου καὶ συναιχμαλώτους μου, οἵτινες εἰσιν ἐπίσημοι ἐν τοῖς ἀποστόλοις, οἳ καὶ πρὸ ἐμοῦ γέγοναν ἐν Χριστῷ.
The verb in this verse that is in question is Romans ἐπίσημοι (episēmos). The word means bearing a mark stamped, coined, (quite literally having an outward sign), and is variously translate as well known, notable, outstanding, remarkable, famous and infamous.
A second word in the verse that is debated is the preposition ἐν (en). It is variously translated in, with, by, among, at, on, to, while and when. Context is the key as to how we would translate the word in English. As can be seen above, the AV/KJV translators chose the word “among” to translate the Greek preposition. While the word “among” is used well over 100 times, it is translated as “by” even more, and the vast majority of the time as “in”. Since most of the words that translate the Greek proposition do not make sense, the words “by” or “among” are the best from which to choose.
How then to choose between the two. Even if we go with “among” to translate the Greek, there are various ways to interpret that use. The word “among” itself can be used synonymously with the word “by”. However, the context matters here, and specifically the translations or interpretation of the Greek ἐπίσημοι (episēmos) on how we translate ἐν (en), as you can see from the various translations above.
Those who argue that only the KVJ is the inspired (translated) Word of God would and do argue that it is the correct and only way to translate the verse. But does that translation actually indicate that the two are “apostles”.
Well, the answer depends on the interpretation of the verse and not the translation. The phrase “of note among” itself does not confirm that Andronicus and Junia are apostles. The phrase “of note” simply means they are not simply known, but well known. As such, one can interpret the verse as “whom are well known among the apostles.”
Next we have to decide what is meant by “among” in context. If we go with interpretation that “among” here means “as part of the group of apostles”, the verse could be saying that, “among the group that is the apostles, they are well known.” This would indeed mean that the two are in fact apostles. However, “among” can as “by”, and are not included in the group of apostles. As such, the two are simply “well known by those who are apostles.” This means that Andronicus and Junia are not, in fact, included in the group of people known as apostles.
As you can see, how one interprets the verse determines what one believes the verse is saying. More importantly, this means that the verse itself tells us nothing of whether Andronicus and Junia are apostles or not. The verse simply does not provide enough information of itself for the purpose of self-interpretation. We would have to look outside the verse into other passages of scripture in order to properly interpret the meaning of the verse. Some would argue that the verse is quite plain in its meaning, but the truth of the matter is that it is not. Even among KJV only advocates, there are differences in how they interpret this verse. Some insist that Andronicus and Junia are part of the groups of apostles, while other believe they are well known to the apostles, but are not apostles themselves.
As to your question if women teaching and leading the church, I hope I have shed doubtto the claim that Junia was an apostle, if I haven’t outright refutes the claim Since she wasn’t an apostle, there’s no contradiction in Paul’s teaching on teaching and leadership of the church.
Thank you for your thorough analysis.
Kris Vallotton taught about this today, Feb 9, 2020. Starting tomorrow you can go to Bethel.com and listen to it anytime through Saturday. You do have to do a minimal sign up, but you can then watch a number of things from the week. You can also watch live on Sundays at 11 am and 6 pm.
A passage in the bible is to be interpreted depending on to whom it is addressed.
1 Corinthians 14:34 King James Version (KJV)
34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.
This verse is addressed to people prophesying in church. The prophets are instructed to tell their women not to interrupt.
1 Timothy 2:12 King James Version (KJV)
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
This entire book is addressed to a bishop, telling him how to lead a congregation.
We surmise that there might have been a few women causing distractions during services. In modern times I have witnessed the same situation among tv preachers who allow their wives to participate in the presentations. The wives interrupt constantly.
Galatians 3:28 King James Version (KJV)
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
The bible is specific: no distinction based on sex. Let all things be done decently and in order.
While you are correct that there is no distinction based on sex in the New Testament when it comes to salvation, admittance into the Body of Christ, there is still a distinction in authority, office, and role given by Scripture to men and women.
If you not 1 Tim 2:12-14, the basis for the distinction between women and men in authority is God’s decision to create man first (Adam), and the fact that woman sinned first (Eve). This transcends culture, society, and religion to the point that there can be no argument against the prohibition for women to lead or teach Christian men.
Do you actually believe that people presently hold the office of Prophets and Apostles today?
Apostles had to be eyewitnesses to the resurrection? As shown when they replaced Judas. 15 And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples…21 “Therefore, of these men who have accompanied us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22 beginning from the baptism of John to that day when He was taken up from us, one of these must become a witness with us of His resurrection.”
Hi Darryl, I know many teach the “must be eyewitnesses of the resurrection” idea. But think again. Was Apollos an eyewitness? Was young Timothy?
Hi Darryl,
I appreciate you for the noble work of searching Scriptures. And you are absolutely right that Judas was not replaced by Paul. You ask, “Was Timothy an apostle?” When we read 1 Thessalonians 1:1 together with 1 Thessalonians 2:6 we find both Timothy and Silvanus are included as apostles.
God bless you as we all continue seeking truth in love,
Mark
Both Peter and Paul identified the requirements for being a “true Apostle” (2 Cor. 12:12) of which swing the Risen Christ was required (Acts 1:21-22, 1 Cor. 9:1).
Now, the question is this: does the word apostle (ἀπόστολος) always refer to those specifically specifically to lead the new church, as Apostles, or does it also refer to men in the general idea of an envoy/delegate, as we are all apostles of Christ in that sense?
The 13 true Apostles authority directly from Christ, while the other variously named apostles had their authority from the Apostles.
Perhaps we have all missed an important point.
2 Peter 1:3 According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:
The concept of “apostles” is not fully explained in the bible, and we really have no business guessing and arguing. If it pertained unto life and godliness, it would have been explained more fully.
The most important application of this study is to correct bumbling people who think there is something spiritual about twelve leaders of this or that group.
Your call for humility is well taken. God bless you.
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for your comment. We need to remember Christ arose. As the ascended Christ and Head of the Church, He appointed some as apostles . . . . (Ephesians 4:11ff). These are generally called the ascension gift apostles and of course, receive their authority directly from Him.
Hi Mark,
You kind of ran around the point I was making in your reply.
Yes, the men Gifted as Apostles to the church are part of the ascension gifts, which was Dr.instated early in the infancy of the church, namely Acts 2. Those 12, plus Paul, were the foundational gifting to the church as Apostles, taking their authority directly from the Risen Christ (in person , as it were. He called the original 12 such, then Judas was replaced by Matthias according to prophecy to fill his spot among the 11. Paul was later added to that group. Outside of those 13 Apostles, we have no other accounting of being directly ordained by Christ, in person, and meeting the requirements of a true Apostle. This is the difference between Apostle and apostle.
If we assume that everyone who is called an apostle is one gifted to the church and equal with and counted among the aforementioned 13, then we have women (at least two depending on how one translates the Greek) who have authority over men in the church. This would vitae Paul’s basic prohibition of women’s role in the church, namely they are not to have (usurp) the role of authority (primarily in teaching) over men. As an Apostle has the Authority if Christ backing him, this would mean they are the authority in all church areas (teaching, correction, discipline, etc.) directly Under Christ, our Head.
Was Barnabas and Apostle, or an apostle who was sent out from Antioch to be a missionary evangelist (another of the “Ascension Gifts”)? If he was merely commissioned to represent the church as an ambassador (or sent out one) then he is actually at the third rung of authority in the church, under Apostle first, then Prophet, and a step above the pastor-teacher (the fourth and lowest rung of authority).
A careful study of Paul’s letters will show that when he identifies himself, he mentions that he is a called Apostle. Yethe does not use the word Apostle to identify his co-laborers as such. He uses many others, but never Apostle, or even apostle, to identify them. One might ask if this was to keep anyone from misidentifying them as part of that upper tier authority of men gifted to the church.
Note that I am not saying there are not men who are called “apostle”, only that I do not believe that there are more then 13 men called as Apostle, the gifting to the church of men with the most authority within the church who were the foundation upon which we have our doctrines, who themselves are built upon our chief cornerstone, Christ.
Matthew
Not to mention, the Apostle Paul!
How about Mary Magdalena?
http://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/.premium-1.545784?fb_action_ids=10200456655328097&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582
Mary Magdalena gets some attention in the pages of the New Testament. However, she is never considered to be an apostle. I list only those explicitly mentioned as apostles.
Thanks for your question.
Simple and clear. At this point in my walk with Christ, I believe the surest sign of a humble and useful intellect in Christ is the living communication of truth, as opposed to an autopsy of Scripture. Refreshing article. Glad to have found this. – Jp
Hi Jim,
Your mention of humility reaches me. Certainly a quality much needed. Thanks for your words.
Did you sign up for further updates?
Yes, I did. Looking forward to them
Hi, I desire to subscribe for this blog to take latest updates, thus
where can i do it please assist.
Hi Mona,
Thanks for your inquiry. At the top of the blog there is a sign up form. It’s right under “Receive Goodies in your inbox. . . ” Just enter your first name and then your email, then click on the red GO button.
Do it soon because the article will be changed shortly.
Mark
I came across your article as I have been studying what is an Apostle lately. Two thoughts I have. Is being an apostle “fathering” according to scripture? I’ve often heard that being an apostle and fathering are inter-changeable. I am not sure that being an apostle according to definition is fathering but what about in the way apostles are presented? Is the nature of an apostle what we refer to as fathering? Then the 2nd thought is if an apostle is about fathering then can woman be apostles also? I am Interested to hear your thoughts. I would guess woman not being apostles is the ideal because a of what Paul said “A woman should not have authority over a man” and being a father expresses authority. Anyhow I do not want to look too deep or come to such an early conclusion just trying to sort out my thoughts! Thanks for your reply.
Hi Erik,
Yes, the idea of “fathering” can help us understand the nature of apostolic calling, but an apostle is more than that. Some veteran apostle’s comments that are published on this site will offer further insight.
It looks like you have a keen mind and searching heart. God bless you, Erik.
1 Timothy 2:12 King James Version (KJV)
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
Please remember this is explicitly addressed to a bishop, not to the entire church. The other verse that is often quoted (or misquoted) is 1 Corinthians 14:34 and that is explicitly addressed to prophets. Women are not commanded to keep silence, husbands are told to tell their wives not to interrupt services.
I’ve been wrestling with this Scripture recently. No one has yet been able to answer me about why God would inspire enduring, eternal Holy Scripture that was applicable to a single and specific community/church/individual that has long-since gone. That doesn’t seem logically coherent or consistent with the everlasting relevance and truth of His Word. Are there other instances in the New Testament where directions are given to one specific church/group of individuals that does not apply to the entire church of Jesus Christ, or is it just supposedly this one? I fear that the feminist movement/modern society has successfully managed to influence our interpretation of this Scripture to twist it to have some kind of sexist intention, rather than as a direction of God’s design for His church under the authority of Christ.
Can anyone please answer me on this? I’m not trying to be disrespectful toward women as I believe they’re vital to the body of Christ, but I am merely questioning the man-made argument that this isn’t applicable in this day and age in order to be truthful and honest to the Word of God.
Is this issue of women being allowed or denied to positions of leadership a salvation issue? Or is it more of a secondary kind of issue that has classically been cause for division in the body of Christ? I’m personally unsure, which is why I’m here writing.
Thank you.
goodday.I’m just curious in the teaching of my ptr that says we are an apostolic believer.founded in apostles teaching .therefore we should follow them because the Lord Jesus appointed peter in matt. 16:15-19.also when it comes to baptism.(acts 2:38) and not matt.28:18..I just want to be guided and know the truth. Thank you.
Hello lolit,
Sorry for the late reply. I’m still learning how to use WordPress. I admit I’m unclear about your question. Please write again and let me know what you’re asking. God Bless you, Mark.
when were the first people baptized in the name of the Father, Son and holy ghost?
Hi B Mark Anderson. I find your article to be intriguing. However, I have one question for you. Are there any apostles living among us today?
Hi Corey,
I’m sorry that I failed to answer your question “Are there any apostles alive today?” Yes, some have even endorsed my book Local Churches Global Apostles: How Churches Related to Apostles in the NT Era and Why It Matters Now. I recently returned from Mexico where a noted apostle named Jairo Carbojal works.
Hi B Mark Anderson. It’s me again. I apologize for the question. I’ll just read your article on Modern Day Apostles, Do They Exist Today…
Thanks
How about the 72? Just a thought?
Luke 9:1-2,6,10, 10:1,17,10, NIV – (1) When Jesus had called the Twelve together, he gave them POWER AND AUTHORITY to drive out all demons and to cure diseases, (2) and he sent them out [Greek = “apostled them”] to preach the kingdom of God and to heal the sick. … (6) So they set out and went from village to village, preaching the gospel and healing people everywhere. … (10) When the apostles returned, they reported to Jesus what they had done. … (10:1) After this the Lord appointed seventy-two others [72 OTHER “WHATS”?] and sent them [Greek = “apostled them”] two by two ahead of him to every town and place where he was about to go. … (17) The seventy-two returned with joy and said, “Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name.” … (19) I have given you AUTHORITY to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power [thus they were given power] of the enemy; nothing will harm you.
The 72 were “apostled” just like the 12, and they were given power and authority just like the twelve.
HI David,
Thanks for the note. You seem to be a really good Bible student.
The word “apostle” is used in the NT in a couple of different ways. It’s true the root of the word means to be “sent out.” In that sense we are all apostles.
Then there is the use of the word to mean a specific calling in ministry. Check 1 Cor 12:27,28, 29 and Ephesians 4:11 and 12. I am using the term “apostle” not in the general sense, but in the restricted sense that refers to the ministry office of apostle.
God bless you,
Mark
An apostle is one who is sent out. It is also the term used if ambassadors, as they are sent out from and by the king (president, etc.). As such, all who are in Christ are, in fact, apostles, because we are all sent out by Christvto be his witnesses.
Paul, however, distinguishes between those gited to the church with apostleship, those who are called aposltes because they are sent out by the church, and a true Apostle. The listing of Apostles in Acts 1 are this if the true Apostle classification. Mathias was added to that list as a mandate/fulfilment of prophecy. Paul was also added to that list by Christ himself, yet is normally keot separate from the remaining 12 post-Judas. Thus, there were 12 Apostles, as Christ identified them before his death, burial and resurrection, and there are 13 that are considered “true Apostles” after Christ Ascension.
The gift if apostleship given to the church in Eph. 4 may simply mean the 12 from Acts and Paul. Their authority was pivitol in the founding of the early church. As to the other apostles (with a lower case a) were those that were commissioned and sent out as representatives of the church. As to James the Son of Joseph and half-brither of Jesus, while he was counted as part of the post-Ascension 12, there is debate as to whether he is rightly part of the “true Apostle” crowd.
You seem to be suggesting that there is some distinction between “true” apostles and some other variety. God can not lie, so it is likely that all apostles named as such are true, and I suggest that if God had meant to have more than one context for the word He would have established it, as He did for faith. Faith is a natural ability, but there is a second context: Romans 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
Then we have Ephesians 4:11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; 12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: 13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
If we still have teachers, we must still have some apostles. If we still have pastors, we must still have some prophets. If we still evangelists, we must still have some apostles, prophets, pastors and teachers.
Hello!
Please note the timing in which Jesus named Apostles according to Ephesians 4… although Jesus had already named the 12, please note that AFTER He ascended, He named (more) Apostles, Prophets, Pastors, Teachers and Evangelists. Christ had already named Apostles, so if He had not indeed named more than the 12/13, then when He ascended He would have had no need to name “Apostles” amongst the other gifts He mentioned that He gave to the church (because He would have already named only the 12/13).
“(Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.) And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:”
Ephesians 4:9-13 KJV
Why did Jesus give us Apostles, Prophets, Pastors, Teachers, and Evangelists?
Answer: (according to Ephesians 4) “For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ”
How long will these 5 gifts to the Body of Christ be needed in order to fulfill what Jesus sent them to do?
Answer: (according to Ephesians 4) “Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ”
Has the Church yet come to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ?
Answer: No, not yet.
Therefore, we still need every gift that Jesus still gives to us.
Also, a great question:
If at the same time Jesus named Apostles, He also named Pastors, Prophets, Teachers and Evangelist, yet He “stopped” naming Apostles—why wouldn’t He stop naming Pastors, Prophets, Teachers, and Evangelists as well?
Who named our Pastors? Didn’t Jesus also say in Ephesians that HE gave us Pastors? Why don’t we see the masses disputing over how many Pastors there are in the church? Isn’t it Jesus that named them? And if Jesus is still naming Pastors—why not Apostles (& Prophets, Teachers, & Evangelists)?
The role of the Apostle is come in the image of their Sender (Jesus); to deliver sound doctrine to the church; to deliver the true meaning and understanding of what God is saying in the Bible.
I tell you the truth—if our enemy, Satan, can get us believing that Jesus is not still naming Apostles, then Satan can also have the church coming up with all sorts of denominations, accepting all types of strange doctrines. Pastors are to shepherd the flock, and that is their gifting of Christ to the Body—but Apostles gifted to know the heart of the Father concerning doctrine (teaching and understanding of the Scriptures), and are to edify the Church in unity therein.
If Jesus is no longer naming Apostles, according to Ephesians 4, then He’s no longer naming Pastors, Evangelists, Teachers, & Prophets either.
We must receive the unique love of God, and embrace the truth in the gifts that He is still providing for His church until we see Him face to face.
With much love & passion for you, in the name of Jesus Christ,
Kordell
Acts 1:24-26 The apostle cast lots to pick Matthias. Surely this is not the way things are to be done in the Church, but this was before they were baptized with the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost. Paul saw Jesus, but in a different way than the others. That’s why he compares it to a child born out of due time. In Revelation it describes city. It had the names written of the 12 tribes of the children of Israel. We know that there are only 12 tribes and there will never be anymore tribes. The city has a talk wall and the 12 foundations are the name of the 12 apostles. When Judas lost his office, it was given to Paul by the same person that chose the other 12, the Lord Jesus himself.
Hi Bro John. Thanks for writing. Please keep searching the Scriptures.
Hey John,
I’m sure you are aware that Matthias was chosen as a replacement for Judas according to Scripture. Peter, under inspiration of the Holy Spirit, quotes Ps. 109:8, in Acts 1:20 (NASB95): “Let another man take his office.” Peter then gives the specific requirements for one to be put forward, ” Therefore it is necessary that of the men who have accompanied us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us— 22 beginning with the baptism of John until the day that He was taken up from us—one of these must become a witness with us of His resurrection” (Acts 1:21–22 (NASB95).
So, in answer to your question, casting lots was exactly how it was done.
The word messenger doesn’t qualify a person as apostle. Evangelist can be considered a messanger, but we know that is another ministry. We are all called to be messengers of God and witness to people, that doesn’t make one an apostle. If they were apostles in the same sense as Paul and the others, they would have used the word apostle and not messenger. The book of Revelation says that the eternal city has a wall with 12 foundations and each one has the name of the 12 apostles. I find it hard to believe that a person chosen by casting lots, like Matthias, has their name on one of the foundations and not Paul. Whom was chosen by The Lord Jesus himself and wrote most of the epistles.
Luke 7:27 calls John the Baptist a messenger, but that doesn’t make him an apostle. 2 Corinthians 12:7 it is talking about the messenger of satan sent to buffet Paul. Obviously in this text the word messenger doesn’t mean apostle. To say that there were at least 25 apostle because one thinks that the word apostle and messenger are interchangeable is incorrect. It also makes the ministry of apostle seem like it was not unique, something that isn’t true.
Hmm. No mention of the fact that Junia is a woman’s name, therefore we had at least one female apostle? Tsk, tsk. Good job otherwise though.
I have a question. So there were 12 Apostles plus Paul as I would define capital A apostles. In Revelation 21 it speaks of the 12 foundations and on them were the 12 names of the 12 apostles of the Lamb. So … who is it excluding? Being Paul came later would he not be included in this?
Thank you so much.
Hi Donna, thanks for your question. Generally, we distinguish between the 12 apostles of the Lamb and the Ascension-gift apostles. Ascension apostles are those Jesus chooses as ascended Head and Lord over the church. These include Paul, Timothy, Barnabas and all apostles throughout the history of the church. Please refer to Ephesians 4:7 and following.
Is this helpful?
I agree with Matthew. Keep in mind that the disciples of Christ were His appointed apostles. While Judas was a disciple, I do not believe he was an apostle. Matthias took Judas’ place as apostle since he committed suicide after selling Jesus out.
We personally know over 90 people who confess to an apostolic call from the Lord Jesus. Many of these people were rejected by the denominational church, because the denominational church system doesn’t often believe in modern-day Apostles. The usual Sunday morning service is so organized, there is no room for the Holy Spirit to speak spontaneously, resulting in unheard utterance from someone who may in fact be an ordained-by-Jesus Apostle. But, that said, we believe in Eph 4:11-16—-that Jesus truly will build His church and probably use this 5-fold ministry along the way, which includes Apostles. He will accomplish His plan—not self-styled false Apostles, of which there are many, but Jesus Himself, speaking through humble people.
We’d like to go on record for saying when we studied the scriptures to uncover Apostles, our list numbered 28. We included 3 (that weren’t on Brother Mark’s list) because they were sent —Strong’s #649 Apostello): Tychicus (II Tim 4:12); Erastus (Acts 19:22) and one Judas Barsabas (Acts 15:22 and 27, who appears to be a different person from the Judas of the original 12). We believe in Eph 4:11-16 and look to the fulfillment of this prophecy.
1 cor 12:28 to the church was first given apostles…….. true apostles are not in todays institutions but waiting for the Lord’s time and only than will Gods purposes will take place. God will use the apostles to bring the true gospel and right foundation to be establish and it will start by Gods true apostles not all tv preachers movements
Hey Brother, you are missing 70 Apostels.
The one sent out along with the original 12 in Luke chapter 1. There’s 83 right there, the 70 plus the original 12 plus Jesus.
Then we get to start adding the others listed in Acts and the epistles.
Thanks for doing such Great work.
Check out lk10.com as well.
Your Brother,
Phil Snow
Mr. Anderson!
I have a couple questions for this topics on Apostle!
The word Apostle can be in general concept and also in a specific way.
Bible believing Christians are called to go into the world to preach the gospel. From a general concept, the child of is called.
I believe that the Bible is very specific with the gifts of the Apostle office.
There can only be twelve Apostles. There is no validity in the scriptures for 13 nor 25 Apostle. The Apostolic office begins after the ascension of Christ. There were 11 Apostles and Paul is the twelve Apostles.
Although Peter cast lot and it fell on Mathias. But the Scriptures never mentioned anything about him. And if you read the conversion of Paul. The Bible is cleared that Paul was in the household of Judas. A key to understand that Christ intentionally chose Paul to replace Judas.
I want to point a few things out for you to understand.
1. Not everyone who called himself or herself an Apostle is an Apostle of Christ.
Rev. 2:2 “…. and thou hast tried them to which say they are Apostles, and they are not, and found them liars.” Wow, I wonder how many these days are found liars.
2. An Apostle is chosen by Christ and not by prayer nor casting lot
John 15:16 “ Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ……”
Acts 9:15 “ But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he (Paul) a chosen vessel unto
me (Christ), to bear my name before the Gentiles…..”
The casting of lot was an Old Testament practice, even the soldiers casting lot for Christ garment . However this can be debated (Mathias or Paul).
Acts 9:11: “And the Lord said to him, “Get up and go to the street called Straight, and inquire at the house of Judas for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for behold, the prayers,.
Mr. Anderson, here is the 911. How can a blind Saul from the road of Damascus end up praying in the house of Judas. Have you ever thought about that?
This is how God straight things out. God is always in control. If it was for man, Paul would have never been an Apostle. Paul said to the Corinthians, “by the Grace of God I am that I am (1 Cor. 15:10) . The Apostles were chosen by Christ not by request nor casting of lot.
3. I have one more thing to say but I leave it for later on. Remember what I said, “there is only twelve Apostles”.
PS. I love the Bible, the Bible is the best self-commentary. The Word of God cures all confusions.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Hi Jean J, thanks for weighing in. How do you know there can only be twelve apostles? Any Scriptural basis for that limitation?
Thanks for your article and good learning. After studying through, I believe the word “apostles” was coined by the Lord himself in Luke 6:13, “whom he also named apostles”. Hence, apostles would be the ones directly called by the Lord himself. We see that Judas’ place had to be filled but the calling of Matthias was by lots and not of the Lord. I believe this to be one of Peter’s early mistakes as he takes the lead. However, we do see the calling of Paul and he himself, says “called to be an Apostle” in Romans 1:1. Paul would have filled Matthias’ place.
I would rule out James, as Paul says that Jesus appeared to James, and all the apostles. He makes a distinction there. Also, Gal 1:19 would not suggest James as an apostle. I would interpret it as Paul saying he didn’t see any of the apostles but he saw James the brother of Jesus. Moreover, in James 1:1, he does not call himself as an apostle. Hence the point that James does not call himself as an apostle, and Paul also refers to him separately in 1 Cor 15:7, “After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles.” disqualifies James.
The allusion to Barnabas seems valid, as we see the calling of the Holy Spirit specifically to separate them for the work as they go to Cyprus.
I would also rule out Timothy, and Silvanus, putting them in a separate class. Paul seems to use the word apostle collectively when he refers to himself along with them. “as apostles of Christ” in 1 Thess 2:6, which is not a direct reference.
I agree with someone who pointed out that Andronicus and Junia was “of note among the apostles” would mean they were well known by the apostles and would rule them out.
Finally, there are 11 + Paul + Barnabas, + (perhaps Timothy, and Silvanus). I would also put Barnabas, Timothy and Silvanus under a category of apostles made by men and not directly called by Jesus Christ as pointed out by Paul in Gal 1:1, “Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)”
Hi Timothy,
You sound like a good student of the Bible. Keep thinking. I appreciate you for thinking. At the same time, if the Scripture says someone is an apostle (as in Gal 1:19), who are we to think otherwise? Further, in Acts 15 James led the apostolic council. Would a non-apostle actually be head and leader of a group of apostles?
Revelation 21:14 states that there are 12 foundations in the architecture of the New Jerusalem and each foundation is named for the 12 Apostles of the Lamb.
I suspect, but cannot prove, that these 12 Apostles are the original 11 (Judas Iscariot obviously not there) and the Apostle Paul. Matthias was probably a great guy and a solid believer, but his inclusion in the TWELVE was by human vote and a game of chance.
JESUS chose the original twelve by His own personal calling. He even knew that Judas Iscariot would betray him when He made that selection.
So, looking again at Revelation 21:14 – there are twelve men named there and no more. It has to be the original 12 (minus Iscariot) plus either Matthias or Paul. Paul, like the original called by Jesus Himself, was called by… Jesus Himself. Matthias was chosen by committee, albeit a Christian committee whose hearts were unquestionably sincere and honest. But, Matthias is never mentioned again in all of scripture whereas Paul’s writings and experiences withe the Lord abound in breadth and depth.
Finally, remember, the idea to choose a replacement came from Peter. This was before Pentecost so the indwelling Spirit of God was not yet operating in those in the upper room. This same Peter was the one who, about 5-6 weeks earlier, told Jesus ‘may it never be’ when Jesus was foretelling His sacrifice, earning a stern rebuke “Get thee behind Me, Satan”. The same Peter who impulsively swore he would never deny Jesus
– yet did so three times. The same Peter who attacked a Roman soldier who was in the party that arrested Jesus in the garden. I find it no coincidence that it is Peter who had this idea that something had to be done THEN and NOW to replace Iscariot, despite Jesus’ instructions to… wait.
Again, look to Revelation 21:14 where the number twelve is unambiguous. Who are THESE twelve?
Jesus Christ is the Apostle and High Priest of our profession. It is the only time in the word of God, KJV that Apostle is capitalized!!!
To the person that posted “no need to mention Jesus as being an apostle.” Would leave out the Apostle, and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus. Who is also God.
Heb 3:1 Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus;
Jesus was not considered in the orignal12 apostles he chose and Paul he later chose.
Apostle Christ Jesus, if it were not for the Apostle Christ Jesus, there would be NO apostles..
As thinking followers of Jesus, may we ask what the theological implications of this discussion are? Are there men and women who go to a people group, share the gospel that results in the establishment of 1 or more churches, and this person oversees them as a parent would a child and adolescent, teaching them and correcting them to grow in the faith? That would be what an apostle does. We are not about to condone the rejection of the foundation of faith given through the initial 12 apostles and others, but these “special ones” need a functional title. Would that not be apostle?
Mama Beth (as she was known), a born again Catholic RN, prayed for a woman in Saudi Arabia with a terminal illness. The woman was instantly healed, so she asked Mama Beth to pray for her family, and out of all this there was born an underground church in Saudi Arabia. Then more churches were born. When I met Mama Beth in 2002 she was overseeing all these house churches, praying for them, encouraging them and visiting them as she could. To me, these fruit sound a lot like the apostle Paul on his missionary journeys.
AFFILIATE PARTNERSHIP
Hello ;
I introduce myself I am Emma of the brand Jesus King (jesus-king.com) and I come to you to propose you a request for partnership because we have the desire to share the gospel. We are lovers of God, and we would like to work with you.
We propose you an affiliate program which consists in sharing our site and according to the sales thanks to this sharing you will receive a commission.
The Advantages Of Our Affiliation
• 20% commission on each sale
• Get passive income every month
• After 50 sales you have 100 dollars of order available on our website.
Thank you to answer this mail if you are interested, we would like to know more about you.
Regards
I know there are many translations of the Holy Bible today….Is this a good or a bad thing? Well, if the Bible is being translated into other languages, ie..into Spanish, Greek, Hebrew, English, French, etc…then this is a very good thing! The problem comes when the translation gets twisted by interpretation! See, it’s okay to translate the Word of GOD into other languages as in tongues, like on the Day of Pentecost! By we should try our very best, not to intrepid it from our own Understanding! That’s the HOLY SPIRIT’s job to do! Now II Timothy 2:15 says ” To Study/Be Diligent to show yourself approved unto GOD, that as a Workman, we need not be ashamed, as we Rightly divide the Word of Truth!
I have yet to find anyway in the Bible where they are listed or defined more than 14 Apostles! The Original 12 – 1, which is Judas Iscariot. Plus Paul and Barnabas. An Apostle is one who was Sent out by JESUS CHRIST Himself! Which includes Mattahis; read the scriptures:
Acts 1:20-26 20 “For it is written in the book of Psalms: ‘Let his dwelling place be desolate, And let no one live in it’; and, ‘Let another take his office.’ 21 “Therefore, of these men who have accompanied us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22 “beginning from the baptism of John to that day when He was taken up from us, one of these must become a witness with us of His resurrection.” 23 And they proposed two: Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias. 24 And they prayed and said, “You, O Lord, who know the hearts of all, show which of these two You have chosen 25 “to take part in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.” 26 And they cast their lots, and the lot fell on Matthias. And he was numbered with the eleven apostles.
So we know how the original was all chosen by JESUS and sent out! Judas failed and his Office was given to another Matthias! Now Paul became an Apostle on the Road to Damascus, where he encountered and met JESUS and JESUS sent him out after Teaching and Training him through the HOLY SPIRIT!
Now this is Implied and Implicit…but Barnabas called an Apostle by {Luke?} in the book of Acts. Was chosen by the 12 Apostles in the book of Acts and sent out! This is the only explanation of why Barnabas was called an Apostle:
Acts 14:14 14 But when the apostles Barnabas and Paul heard this, they tore their clothes and ran in among the multitude, crying out.
But with that being said, there are Certainly No Real Apostles today! Howbeit there are some False Apostles, just as there are False Teachers and Prophets today! The Bible warns us to beware, to Test the Spirit by the Spirit! And again to Study to show ourselves approved unto GOD/JESUS Himself that we not be easily fooled and duped!
AMEN!
The Bible also doesn’t mention any disciples that were made 80 years after Jesus was crucified. Does that mean disciples no longer exist?
When we stop using the Bible as an attempt to justify why God can or cannot do a thing (& continually raise people up to equip and empower His people for their purpose and calling concerning the work of the ministry), we will begin seeing and hearing what the Spirit of the Lord is saying to His Church.
If there are no more Apostles, how do we get more pastors?
When Jesus gave gifts to the church in Ephesians 4, did he not also ordain pastors too? Yet some were given to be apostles, pastors, teachers, prophets, and evangelist (all mentioned as gifts for the church at the same time). Unless Jesus stopped ordaining people as pastors, He surely did not stop ordaining the other 4 governmental offices.
We must dig deeper in prayer. The Scriptures never limit who God is and the power of His Spirit to anoint, appoint, ordain, and send out. We must humbly ask and seek the One who was and is and is to come, to open our eyes and ears in this time.
Thank you for your reply. However I and we should always yield to the Word of GOD and to His HOLY SPIRIT as the final Authority! You are right disciples are being being trained up today, just not disciples of JESUS Himself! We are to be disciples of our LORD JESUS, yes but the Bible clearly states that John had disciples as well as JESUS. As far as that’s concerned, Paul, Peter, Timothy and so on had disciples…..as we know disciples are only Students of a Teacher!
Now, when people want to use the term, “let’s not put GOD in a box” seems only to be an excuse for them to expand on GOD’s Word! The scriptures clearly tell us not to “add or take away from His Word! And GOD is the same Yesterday, Today and Forevermore! He does not change! We are required to change not GOD! So although it’s true GOD can use anything or anyone He chooses. Is not a Broad Gateway to anything or anyone goes! You see, the LORD will Never Contradict or Compromise His Word! No matter what you and anyone else says or thinks! He wouldn’t be GOD if He needed us to determine what could or could not be! Furthermore the Word of the LORD says in 2 Timothy 3:16-17 16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good!
And I do believe All scriptures, means ALL! So there’s no need for us to guess or assume. If GOD said it, the LORD meant it and we are to Obey it!
What I see today, no doubt is the beginning of the Falling Away! People are leaning to their own understanding, looking for itchy ears to agree to what they believe and want, rather than accepting what GOD has already said and let that be that!
I thank the LORD GOD for Him leaving us the HOLY SPIRIT, the SPIRIT of TRUTH! We really need Him during these End Times and Last Days!
Furthermore, with a Study of the so called Five Fold Ministry found in: Ephesians 4:11-16 11 And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, 12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13 till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; 14 that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, 15 but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head — Christ — 16 from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.
Key verse here and often times overlooked is (13) til or until we we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; 14 that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, 15 but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head — Christ — 16 from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.
If you Study this and not just read it. The Apostles were given to help establish the foundation of the Church! Ephesians 2:19-20 19 Now, therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, 20 having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief cornerstone,
The Prophets were given mainly in times of Old…to prophesy about the coming of the LORD JESUS and to Warn GOD’s people.
Evangelists were given to go out to different countries and preach the Gospel.
Pastors/Elders/Bishops are One in the same….were given to have Oversight, thus the meaning of each Title = Overseer. Of the Local Church after it is established!
And Teachers were given for the purpose of teaching in and out of the Local and the Universal Church of GOD!
These Gifts were given to edify us until we become Mature and understand who JESUS CHRIST is and can then teach and train others to know the Faith and Unity of GOD! Not being children toss to and fro by every wind of Doctrine of Men!
II Timothy 2:15 STUDY!
//If there are no more Apostles, how do we get more pastors?//
We get pastors by discipling believers and training (teaching). But, no Apostle assigned pastors. Neither Timothy not Tutus were Apostles, were they gifted men, able to teach? Absolutely, but they were not Apostles. Paul left these to behind to do one thing, to train and assign elders, just as Paul had done, and those elders then trained other men and ordained those who desired the position and had the requisite qualifications as elders ( 2 Timothy 2:2 (NASB95): The things which you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses, entrust these to faithful men who will be able to teach others also.). Some of these may be gifted as pastor-teachers, others as administrators, others as teachers and whatnot. But there is no position/office within the church as pastors: only elder/overseers (aka bishops) and deacons.
Now, it is these elders who pastor the church. When Paul bud farewell to the Ephesus church, he did not call the pastors, rather he called the elders (Acts 20:17 (NASB95): From Miletus he sent to Ephesus and called to him the elders of the church.). It is these elders (or overseers) that then have the duty to pastor the church (Acts 20:28 (NASB95): Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.).
We do not need Apostles to ordain or even train pastors, that is the job if every elder; to train men in sound doctrine and to ordain those who desire and are qualified for the office of elder/overseer.
Praise God ☝ for this stirring discussion, and each & every one of these mostly respectful, and humbly delivered, interactions on these matters:
The matters concerning the Big “A” Apostles, like the 12 –with Mathais, Not Judas– and the 13th Apostle, ‘abnormally born’, as Paul puts it– and those who are the Foundation of the Church– After, of course, THE High Priest, THE APOSTLE, ‘Sent One’, the Holy One of God, Our LORD Jesus Christ -Messiah, The Cornerstone/Capstone/Foundation Himself–‘GOD in a Bod’.
And I’m also Very Thankful for so many great expositions of Scripture in these comments threads that make it clear there are not only many ‘sent ones’, including women –& that (Like 2 Cor. 5:14-21/6:1-2), ALL of us who are Truly in Christ, are ‘ambassadors’, ‘God’s fellow workers’, and His messengers called to share and to BE the embodiment of the Ministry and Message of Reconciliation.
In addition, I appreciate the well worded discourse from so many commentators and the author himself, on the Gifts God gives to us, for some to be pastors, prophets, teachers, administrators, those specially gifted for Mercy, Generosity, Encouragement, etc.–But, without much doubt, it sure seems that the WORD of God, and His Spirit of Truth are making it quite clear that a small “a” apostle gifting has indeed existed, down through the Ages, and that such apostles of our Great God shall continue to exist, until we are ALL made complete in Him, FINALLY, on the Day of Christ (Philippians 1:6, Hebrews 10:14 & 12:2, Philippians 2:16, just for starters).
I firmly believe that those with His gifting of “apostle”, may include MANY who’ve been used by God mightily, and were given Multiple Spiritual Giftings as well, to HIS GLORY ALONE, and have Lived fruitful Lives as Pastors, Ministers, Evangelists, Missionaries, Teachers, and Prophets. AND these apostles with a small “a” include those who’ve helped build-up, exhort, encourage, admonish, teach and Lead us in the growth of His One Universal Church, and its regular recurring reformation, in the past 2000 years (see Ephesians 4:1-16; 1 Peter 4:7-15, Romans 12, 1 Corinthians 12-14, and elsewhere).
But of course, God’s Giftings as a modern, small “a” apostle, or His giftings in ANYTHING else, are completely meaningless without the Supernatural Fruit of His Spirit of Love. I’m speaking of the Real, Authentic ‘Lay down our lives’ kind of Christ-Like Love, in action that we’ve each been impossibly called to, for our neighbors, brothers and sisters in Christ, and especially for the hardest folks to love, in each of our individual lives– like some family members, coworkers, antagonists and enemies/persecuters. I say impossible, because apart from the Ministry of the Spirit, and New Birth in Him, as a New Creation, born of God, and learning to walk in the Spirit, this kind of Love cannot happen, and is contrary to everything our sin nature’s desire.
Let’s keep this discussion going, and also keep it focused on Glorifying God, and the UNITY of His Spirit through the Bond of Peace ❣️
– Carefully, Prayerfully and Respectfully submitted,
in Love,
Because He First Loved us,
{1 John 4:19},
-brother dave
{AKA GrandPappy pHLeGm}
Acts 1:21
Mine is a question, where are the apostles today?
For One Example, I believe that many of the missionaries that God is using to His GLORY, for preading the Message and Ministry of Reconciliation– the Ministry of the Spirit and of the New Covenant — that many of these folks would be the apostles of today — just as have their brothers and sisters living as missionaries and Martyrs down through the Ages been….
*preading = preaching
☝❤️
Thank you, I appreciate your correction and letting me know.